Seems like I’m in a big mood for posting. Lots of ideas keep popping up for writing, and so many ideas get shelved in my drafts folder. Here’s one that I think really deserves some talking about.
A while back on the Geomantic Study-Group on Facebook, someone made a thread about stopping their studies of divination. It wasn’t that they weren’t getting good results with divination generally or geomancy specifically—they were!—but rather that they were worried about people misusing the information obtained from readings one for them. It’s easiest to simply quote the original post, with the permission of the author:
Do you often feel bad by the misuse people make from your readings and inputs? That’s certainly my case.
People generally ask me if they will get pretty difficult long-term things in life and get disappointed when the reading says “no”.
Even when the answer is a short-term “yeah what you’re feeling will get a lot worse, seek a treatment ASAP”, people often won’t do this and that gets me angry sometimes.
A third situation is when they get good purely materialistic answers, which makes their mind go deeper in search of 100% materialistic stuff—that is, makes them avoid psychological growth
That’s why having spent a great deal of time and effort to have accuracy in divination I probably won’t follow this further…and that’s somewhat sad.
The conversation was continued by excellent friend and colleagues, and I joined in as well, but I’d like to flesh out some of my thoughts more fully here, because this touches on a really vital point for us all to understand, whether as diviners specifically or as any sort of spiritually-abled person generally.
First, let’s be clear about our topic here. Divining is the act of divination, and divination is the process of uncovering or obtaining knowledge through occult or spiritual means. How it does this is up for debate, but the fact that it does this is uncontroversial, and anyone who is a diviner can do it. Some people do divination for others, some people only do divination only for themselves. Whether you do divination for others or not is a choice that’s entirely up to you, as is whether you do it for a fee or not. That’s all fine, well, and good, but always remember that divination is not counseling. Not only is counseling inherently an act that involves two parties, the counselor and the counseled, but divination is simply obtaining information and relaying it to the one who requested it; counseling is taking that information and applying it in context to a person’s life. The two are completely different sets of skills with entirely different purposes, and not all diviners can be counselors. The issue is that this distinction is not always made clear to people who learn divination, and the notion of what a “reading” is tends to blur such distinctions, especially in many cases where a client or querent has an honest issue on their hands and needs both information and counseling.
The problem of the original post is that of getting stuck in the pull between divination and counseling, and also seeing how people react to your best attempts at guiding and counseling them through divination. The original poster points out that he gets discouraged from doing divination because of three types of people:
- People who get disappointed with the answers of divination because it doesn’t confirm their hopes.
- People who disregard the advice given to them in a reading against the hopes of the reader.
- People who use spiritual means for strictly material ends against the hopes of the reader.
Before discussing any of these, it’s important to note that all these situations take place in the context of doing readings for other people. If the original poster is getting discouraged to the point where he might not “follow [divinatory studies] any further”, then it really should be emphasized that divination can always be done for yourself or for people you trust explicitly; you don’t have to do divination for anyone but yourself, if you don’t want to. There’s no requirement that, having learned divination, you must provide it for others as a service. If you only want to study divination for your own benefit, that’s great! Keep doing that. You don’t owe others something you cultivate for your own benefit.
So, let’s talk about these situations. Let’s say that we have a client who’s coming to a reader for a reading. We can say that, for the sake of this post, either the client has paid or bartered with the reader in an acceptable way and the reader is obliged to give the client a reading, or that the reader is giving a reading to the client free of any charge but as a gift that the reader earnestly wants to give. In either case, it’s understood that the reader is doing readings for other people as their own choice, and once the reading begins, the reader is obliged to give the reading to the best of their ability
It must be noted that, of the three situations above, it’s only the first one that deals with divination strictly and not counseling. In the first situation, we have a querent who comes to a diviner asking about the outcome or possibility for a certain thing in their lives; the divination gives a negative answer, and the querent becomes disappointed and put off. As a reader and diviner, being the bearer of bad news is never fun, and I’ve sometimes had to take a moment to myself after particularly difficult readings to regain my composure. That said, as a reader, I am obliged to give whatever information is in the reading to the client; if it’s there, I must give it to the client because that’s what they’re paying me for (or what I feel obliged to give, in any case). I know there are some people who might take issue with that rule of honesty, but as I see it, for me to be aware of something and preventing someone from also being aware of it, especially when they’re specifically directing me to help them be aware of it, is immoral and unethical. Beyond that, just like how I can’t force someone to be happy when I make them dinner, I can’t force them to be happy when I tell them what I read. This is especially a problem (for the client, I should say, not for me) when someone comes to me for a reading that only confirms what they already think and hope for; they don’t actually care about getting new information, they just want to make a mockery of the sacred practices of divination to make themselves feel better, and when they find out that they don’t actually know everything, they get put out. Tough for them, I suppose, but that’s none of my concern.
Regardless of the type of news, news is news, and my only job in a reading as a diviner is to give information to the client. How they react to it is up to them; I have no control over that, nor is it any of my concern. They wanted information, I gave them information. They now know what they did not know, and that’s the end of my role in the situation. Read that again: once the reading is done, the role of the reader is complete. As a diviner, counselor, reader, or whatever term you want to use, it’s important to know your role in a reading and what the reader-client relationship consists of, because that’s what defines your responsibilities, obligations, and level of involvement in the situation. As a reader, your roles can be divvied up into two sets: as diviner, that of intelligence-gatherer, information-compiler, and contextualizer; as counselor, that of adviser, therapist, and listener. All of these roles last for the duration of the reading, after which you’re not beholden to the client for any reason, nor should you be. To stay attached is a matter of emotional over-involvement, and you can’t afford that level of attachment as a reader. Down that way lies bias, which is an inhibition that effectively prevents you from performing divination and counseling. Bias prevents you from seeing things accurately and evaluating the information coming to you critically and objectively, whether it’s the symbols in a chart or the words from your client’s mouth. Getting too attached also gets you also gets you riled up when they’re riled up, or depressed when they’re depressed, and in either case prevents your own equanimity that can spiritually ensure your ability to divine at all.
So, one of the biggest rules to divination in general, no matter the system: if you cannot significantly reduce bias or entirely eliminate it from the reading at hand, you should not do the reading. This works in either direction, whether you’re biased towards or against the situation of the reading or the client requesting it. Regardless whether they’re your friend, husband, or a stranger, if you can’t extract yourself from hopes or fears or hates about the situation or the people involved, then you’re not the right person to do the reading. Divination and counseling requires levelheadedness and objectivity so that you can not only see the information given to you but also communicate it effectively and accurately, and bias disrupts that ability. It’s much like when you’re faced with a situation you’re incredibly anxious about; if you can’t calm yourself or if you’re fixated on the worst possible outcomes, you can’t do divination for yourself because you’re neither mentally fit nor objectively-minded enough to read whatever symbols and information might come through. The same thing also goes for when you’re doing divination or counseling for other people. Yes, bias in counseling matters, too; after all, it’s hard to avoid revulsion and spite if your client is someone you hate, and as hard to avoid enabling and sugarcoating if your client is someone you have affection for. We can minimize these things, sure, but being critical and fair to our client is hard if we lean too far in either direction.
So, with those three statements in bold we’ve got so far, the next situation described by the original poster becomes pretty clear to deal with. In the second case, we have a client who disregards the information, advice, suggestions, and counseling given to them by the reader. Just like how being the bearer of bad news can break my heart, being the bearer of ignored news is often worse, and I definitely sympathize with the frustration. But remember, your role to play is complete once the reading is done. Whether they paid you for a reading or whether they accepted your volunteering for giving them one, your role was only to give them any information they asked for and any advice or suggestions that would be pertinent to their situation. Anything beyond that is uncalled for and, quite honestly, none of your business. Whether or not they take your advice, or any advice at all, is not up to you, just like how their emotional reactions to a particular type of information isn’t up to you. They were warned ahead of time of what would happen, and so they had no excuse to not act on that information, especially when provided with reasonable and applicable advice. Is it frustrating to see people set themselves up for failure? Absolutely. Can I chastise them for it? You bet! But whether or not they sabotaged themselves by their own unwillingness to act doesn’t affect my role in the situation; after all, I’m not their caretaker, I’m just their diviner who does divination for them, their adviser who gives them advice, and their counselor who gives them counsel. That’s all I can do; you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink.
Typically, however, clients don’t usually just up and say “you’re giving me advice that I refuse to take” in the middle of a reading. We commonly know about clients not taking our advice when they’re return clients, those with whom we have a stable reader-client relationship with that lasts over several interactions. In these cases, the client comes back to inform us that something bad in the reading came to pass as you said, or something good didn’t come to pass as you predicted, and it turns out they never took your advice that would have prevented the bad thing or ensured the good thing. That’s honestly not my fault; I told them what would happen or not happen under what circumstances, so they sabotaged themselves by not acting on that information in the prescribed way. Hopefully, they learned from this, and would be more amenable to heeding advice. However, there are cases where sometimes clients just don’t listen, don’t take advice, don’t carry things through to their end, and just aren’t…well, responsible people who take care of themselves. If, after a certain point, you can’t help but get angry or frustrated with this client? Well, that’s a type of bias, isn’t it? And what do we do when we’ve got bias? Not a damn thing, that’s for sure. I know several highly-competent and reliable readers who have had to fire their clients—you read that right, the readers fired the clients and not the other way around. The clients kept flailing for help and kept coming back for it, but never actually use what the reader gave them. After a certain point, each reader has come to the conclusion with “Why am I wasting my time and breath on you? Why are you wasting your time and money on me? Good luck, good bye.”
So, those’re my thoughts on the first two situations: dealing with disappointment and frustration on the part of the client with the content of readings, and dealing with disappointment and frustration on the part of the reader with lazy clients who don’t take advice. The third situation described by the original poster is perhaps the most interesting, and it’s not one that had occurred to me before: being disappointed with using divination for purposes that goes against spiritual or psychological development. That’s…forgive me for being blunt, but that’s an incredibly prejudiced, judgy, holier-than-thou stance that I feel compelled to rebuke and refute. To make it simple, this is an issue with bias on the part of the diviner, and again, if you feel biased against the client, it’s best that you don’t do readings for them.
Why do I feel so negatively about this stance? Simply put, you’re not God. You don’t get to establish the morals, ethics, and goals of other people according to your own, no more than you get to say what divinities I worship or what practices I perform. If you think all spiritual work should be done in the name of elevation, development, and growth, then I would say that you’re wrong; people have been using magic for getting laid and getting paid since the first days of our awareness of spiritual dimensions of the cosmos and of human existence, and I find nothing wrong with doing so. I don’t disagree one jot that spiritual development is a good thing, but I’m not going to knock the physical pleasures of the world, either, which are also good to have and to strive for. And, quite simply, not everyone is going to be playing on the same playing field as you are, nor will they be playing the same games you play. You don’t know the purpose of why someone acts the way they do, nor do you know their reasoning for it, nor do you know whether it’s fate or divinely ordained for them to do so. All you know is that they’re coming to you for help with their purposes; if you find that you react so negatively to their aims, then you should simply decline the to do the reading and move on.
There are cases where I will decline to do readings for people without it being a matter of bias, but because I find the question so offensive or troublesome that I can’t perform the reading in good conscience. For instance, John Michael Greer recommends that, even though divinations to determine health issues or the time and place and conditions of death were hugely common in the historical literature, it would be unethical to do them nowadays. I don’t hold those exact same views, but I have a few that I do hold: for instance, unless it’s for a very reasonable strategic cause, I don’t do third-party readings for the sake of spying on others, because I find that a person’s privacy is pretty much sacrosanct. Likewise, I wouldn’t do a reading about how best to kill someone, how to start a sexual relationship with a child, or other illegal acts. If you find that something is so immoral or unethical to ask about that you cannot answer it in good conscience, you have absolutely every right to decline to perform a reading.
However, I need to contrast “doing things that actively bring harm to the world” versus “doing things for ends I don’t think highly of”. Just because you don’t think someone should only focus on finding material success doesn’t mean that they’re not meant to do that, nor does that mean that they should sit at your feet and learn how the world ought to work. You’re a diviner, not a pastor, and (except in the illegal cases above) when someone comes to you for advice on their query, you don’t get to judge them on it. The most you can do is decline to do the reading for them, but I’ll tell you this: a reputation for being judgy won’t get you many friends, and if you’re doing readings and divination as a business, then it’ll get you even fewer clients. Just as our clients should have an open mind, we as diviners and readers should, too. Besides, you don’t know that they’ll always be 100% materialistic, nor do you know whether the very act of reading for them could change that.
After all, there are indeed people whose jobs and roles in this incarnation aren’t to be spiritual, but still recognize that there’s power in it and want to employ those who interact with spiritual forces. That’s pretty reasonable to me; while I’d like more people to be magicians or spirit-workers, some people have no interest in doing so, or some don’t care about it or just want me to handle the dirty work for them. I cannot bring myself to judge others for where they are in their lives or what they’re doing with their life; as another commenter on Facebook said, “we all have our hoe to row”. I’d recommend staying in your lane on this one; give your advice on being more respectful, worshipful, spiritual, or magical, but at the same time, don’t expect it of or force it onto your clients or querents.
So, those are my thoughts; a lot more words I expected to write on this, and a little impassioned at times. Let me distill it into a quick TL;DR for my readers:
- You don’t have to learn divination for other people if you don’t want to do divination for other people.
- You don’t have to do divination for everyone who comes knocking; you can be as selective with your clients as you want, or you can be as open to all comes as you want.
- Divination is not counseling, but a reading may be both. Be aware of when a client just needs divination or just needs counseling or needs both divination and counseling.
- As a diviner, your role is to give the information present in the reading to the querent who requested it.
- As a counselor, your role is to listen, contextualize information, and give helpful advice to the client.
- It’s not your problem how the client reacts to the information, so long as you were honest, clear, and tactful about it.
- Once the reading is done, the role of the reader is complete.
- If you cannot significantly reduce bias or entirely eliminate it from the reading at hand, you should not do the reading. This applies to readings you do for yourself as well as those you do for others.
- All you can do as a reader is present information and give advice, where called for. Beyond that, you can’t force the client to improve their situation or their life, though you can stop dealing with them if they keep wasting your time.
- Either don’t judge your clients for where they are or what they’re doing with their lives, or don’t do readings for them.
- If you’re going to help people, focus first on helping them as best you can, and less on the overall purpose they’re coming to you for help for.
- If you find a query to be morally, ethically, or legally reprehensible, you have every right as a reader to decline doing a reading for that query.
For me, deciding on ceasing learning and practicing divination because some people are stupid or because I don’t like why some people might use it is like ceasing to be a software engineer because some people don’t know how to use computers properly or use them for porn; I can’t control what other people use their computers for, and I can’t teach everyone the proper care and use of computers. What I can do, however, is make things as best I can for those who can use them and who need my skills in making things work for them. The net gain from doing so is far greater than not doing it at all.